football51 wrote:
Brian Costello
@BrianCoz
#scheinknows "@AdamSchein: The special teams coach that Doug Marrone fired for being awful doesn't like Doug Marrone. Got it.”
Dig a little deeper, and the truth you shall find.
football51 wrote:
Brian Costello
@BrianCoz
#scheinknows "@AdamSchein: The special teams coach that Doug Marrone fired for being awful doesn't like Doug Marrone. Got it.”
AFA2017 wrote:IMO Marrone should not be considered for the Jets HC. Do you really want a coach who leaves his team because you do not like the GM's Move in trading 2 #1's for a premier WR. The #1 rated WR in the Draft. If Idzik had done that he would have been a hero in this city. What happens if we trade up for Marriota giving up 2 #1's? If Marrone is the coach, whats to say he does not opt out his contract. Marrone was the coach, coach your team. He was not the GM. So you got a young QB and you give him a weapon like Watkins and your coach is going to cry over it.
AFA2017 wrote:IMO Marrone should not be considered for the Jets HC. Do you really want a coach who leaves his team because you do not like the GM's Move in trading 2 #1's for a premier WR. The #1 rated WR in the Draft. If Idzik had done that he would have been a hero in this city. What happens if we trade up for Marriota giving up 2 #1's? If Marrone is the coach, whats to say he does not opt out his contract. Marrone was the coach, coach your team. He was not the GM. So you got a young QB and you give him a weapon like Watkins and your coach is going to cry over it.
AFA2017 wrote:Okay, I now understand the Marrone deal with regards to ownership and don't hold that against him. I still disagree with the Watkins trade. Who expected Beckham to have the year he had (Cy didn't)! The Bills are drafting 19th. Its not like they are drafting 6th. They rolled the dice and traded for a gem. Its not like they traded up for Shaq Evans and got crap out of it. They went for the best WR on the board. Look at Green, Julio Jones. Teams trading 2 #1's for difference makers. Would you have traded 2 #1's for CB's Sherman or Revis non QB's. If you said No, Okay, your little secret!
AFA2017 wrote:Okay, I now understand the Marrone deal with regards to ownership and don't hold that against him. I still disagree with the Watkins trade. Who expected Beckham to have the year he had (Cy didn't)! The Bills are drafting 19th. Its not like they are drafting 6th. They rolled the dice and traded for a gem. Its not like they traded up for Shaq Evans and got crap out of it. They went for the best WR on the board. Look at Green, Julio Jones. Teams trading 2 #1's for difference makers. Would you have traded 2 #1's for CB's Sherman or Revis non QB's. If you said No, Okay, your little secret!
LIJETFAN wrote:I did not know that Bowles defense ranked so low in those categories. I am still very much in the Quinn camp. I think there will be some competition for him, particularly from the 49ers, unless they go with someone like Shanahan or Gase. The whole Tannenbaum agency thing could create an issue. Hopefully that will not affect Quinn's decision. My guess is that Quinn will have multiple offers to choose from, and the Jets are going to need to make a very competitive offer to get him.
hobson54 wrote:to be fair to bowles, that team was decimated by injuries and for the end of the year, had to play with inept QBs and no running game, which put undue pressure on the defense. when your team only gains 70 yards in a total game, it's hard for a defense to hold up. and despite giving up a lot of yardage, they still finished 5 in scoring defense.
hobson54 wrote:1(tie) - Marrone and Quinn (originally would have put Marrone #1 because of preference of offense over defense, but some of the "red flags" have me lowering it to a tie between the two)
3 - Bowles (originally would have been in top tier, but I think I've read he may be more comfortable in a smaller market)
4 - Kubiak
5 - Reich
hobson54 wrote:yeah, i put kubiak over reich because of his experience (in addition to being a HC, he was denver's OC from 1995-2003 so he has a couple of rings there). i didn't include mora jr since i haven't seen any confirmation he's actually a candidate. i also didn't include cable or lynn, despite them having interviewed, because they are way down on my list
The guys who don't respond well to it should be out of here, anyway. Honestly, they had the epitome of a players' coach in Rex, and have not had a winning season in four years. The team is only getting what it deserves.cysporsche wrote:Does anyone else out there get a "gut feeling" that if we hire Marrone, that we'll be doing another HC search in less than 4 years.
Yes, he will bring discipline & structure to the Jets; however, after 6 years under Rex, how will our players respond to a no nonsense guy. Yes the Bills kicked our a$$ twice this year, and they improved to a winning record of 9-7, but how much of that success came from Marrone ? Pettine helped improve their defense, and the resurrection of Kyle Orton and drafting of Sammy Watkins defiantly helped their offense.
Being a true Jet homer, I will always support the HC & players, but my gut is telling me that Marrone is not an upgrade from Rex.
Go Jets...Cyborg
SackExchange wrote:The guys who don't respond well to it should be out of here, anyway. Honestly, they had the epitome of a players' coach in Rex, and have not had a winning season in four years. The team is only getting what it deserves.cysporsche wrote:Does anyone else out there get a "gut feeling" that if we hire Marrone, that we'll be doing another HC search in less than 4 years.
Yes, he will bring discipline & structure to the Jets; however, after 6 years under Rex, how will our players respond to a no nonsense guy. Yes the Bills kicked our a$$ twice this year, and they improved to a winning record of 9-7, but how much of that success came from Marrone ? Pettine helped improve their defense, and the resurrection of Kyle Orton and drafting of Sammy Watkins defiantly helped their offense.
Being a true Jet homer, I will always support the HC & players, but my gut is telling me that Marrone is not an upgrade from Rex.
Go Jets...Cyborg
Marrone may not be an upgrade, but he is a fresh approach. Right now, the team needs a fresh approach, because they were getting lazy under Rex's "no accountability" attitude.
I disagree. I think the team got very lazy. They loved playing for Rex, but they didn't seem to love preparing hard or practicing hard for him. And they didn't seem to love winning for him.lnap23 wrote:SackExchange wrote:The guys who don't respond well to it should be out of here, anyway. Honestly, they had the epitome of a players' coach in Rex, and have not had a winning season in four years. The team is only getting what it deserves.cysporsche wrote:Does anyone else out there get a "gut feeling" that if we hire Marrone, that we'll be doing another HC search in less than 4 years.
Yes, he will bring discipline & structure to the Jets; however, after 6 years under Rex, how will our players respond to a no nonsense guy. Yes the Bills kicked our a$$ twice this year, and they improved to a winning record of 9-7, but how much of that success came from Marrone ? Pettine helped improve their defense, and the resurrection of Kyle Orton and drafting of Sammy Watkins defiantly helped their offense.
Being a true Jet homer, I will always support the HC & players, but my gut is telling me that Marrone is not an upgrade from Rex.
Go Jets...Cyborg
Marrone may not be an upgrade, but he is a fresh approach. Right now, the team needs a fresh approach, because they were getting lazy under Rex's "no accountability" attitude.
Completely disagree with the team getting lazy and a fresh approach is needed because of that... I think if Rex had a QB this is a winning team... Simple as that.. This team played hard.. Never got lazy, never gave up...
But Unfortunately we need a fresh approach because Woody got it wrong hiring Idzik. NO way he could fire Idzik and keep Rex had to completely take the team in a new direction.... I don't think Marrone is an upgrade but if he works well with the GM and they find a QB, it will be.
With that said I want Bowles