Blindsidebrick wrote:HYATT wrote:Depends on who's eyes yer looking through.SackExchange wrote:When he was drafted, Jeffery looked more like a guard than a WR.
Hindsight is 20/20.
Was there ever ANY doubt expressed in HYATT's posts on Alshon Jeffery when we were all discussing drafting WRs in 2012 and people were lining up behind their favorite horses?
Blackmon, Floyd, Wright, Jenkins, Quick, Hill, Jeffery, Broyles, Randle, Posey, Graham, Sanu, Hilton, Givens, Benjamin, Adams, Wylie, Wright, Martin, Toon, etc. is how they came off the board but some folks wanted McNutt high, and others wanted Criner and Streeter a lot higher than they went too.
HYATT, if the Mad Cow hasn't eaten away too much of his brain, recalls expressing his desire to see Hill, Jeffery, Quick, & Wright be considered, in that order - and defended Jeffery in multiple debates against this:
WEAKNESSES
Jeffery is an elite jump-ball prospect, but he does not stand out as fast on tape and is such a long strider that at times he looks to be moving in slow motion.
(HYATT equated him with another long-strider who moves with apparent slowness which is actually effortless gliding - Larry Fitzgerald.)
Speed will never be his game, but he needs to become more comfortable in his routes to work the corner and truly gain separation. The development of his route-running skills will be the key to his success. Jeffery was bit uncoordinated early in his career and only began to look comfortable in his body toward the end of his collegiate career.
(Yeah, it took all of 5 SECONDS for Alshon Jeffery to suddenly get "UN-uncoordinated" in CHI. )
The only mistake HYATT made was in believing Hill could become an even better WR than Jeffery, but acknowledged Hill's deficit of experience at GT and longer development cycle.
As for Kerley, HYATT reflects back on Laveranues Coles and how playing with Favre turned him into the STUD of the 2008 WR core.
Who plays QB certainly has an impact on receiver production.
Kerley is not exactly Pro Bowl material, but with no alternative WRs on the field he's going to get a certain number of looks and catch a certain number of balls he wouldn't otherwise on some other teams.
Does HYATT believe he is NFL caliber?
In part, because he's doing the job already, but ask HYATT if he'd replace Kerley in a heartbeat if an even marginally better WR came available and the answer will be "yes, most assuredly".
You still love Stephen Hill, and you think Kerley's a marginal WR?
I don't care where Kerley's playing, he's demonstrated that he belongs in the NFL. And he belongs on this team. I would argue he'd be a solid #3 on any NFL team.
He's so far better than Stephen Hill, I can barely type this without laughing.
While I hate that Hyatt refers to himself as the third person and idk know or care about his views on hill, I do believe his take on Kerlely is spot on.
If you believe otherwise than I would argue ur some combination of being a loyal fan (aka a homer) or just lack awareness about the standard for the rest of the league. Obv that's just my opinion but I believe I gave pretty good evidence of why I believe that in my last post when I responded to 51.
Kerely is solid to good but no where near great, even for a slot wr.