another big stop by the D but they need some help
+23
JohnnyBaseball
Hunter07
Old#15
DonMaynard
hobson54
jetkwondo
trico990
HYATT™
soj
MachinaVerde
The Wicker Man
NCgreen12
LIJETFAN
Atljet60
lnap23
SackExchange
Metjetgal
football51
Sarge
Blindsidebrick
NickSINYC
Superman55
NYJETSDAN16
27 posters
New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
NickSINYC- Honorary Sky Marshall
- Posts : 1235
Points : 13071
Join date : 2014-09-01
- Post n°251
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by NickSINYC Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:26
SackExchange- Moderator
- Posts : 1092
Points : 44832
Join date : 2014-08-29
Age : 49
- Post n°252
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by SackExchange Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:27
And Rodgers' percentage is now below 60% for the day.
Both would have equal picks, if not for the stripes.
Both would have equal picks, if not for the stripes.
SackExchange- Moderator
- Posts : 1092
Points : 44832
Join date : 2014-08-29
Age : 49
- Post n°253
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by SackExchange Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:28
Maybe some Favre didn't run, but Brett, the QB, did.
The Wicker Man- Honorary Sky Marshall
- Posts : 446
Points : 9486
Join date : 2014-09-09
Age : 59
- Post n°254
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by The Wicker Man Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:30
this Vick crap is a joke. Tebow-esque!
SackExchange- Moderator
- Posts : 1092
Points : 44832
Join date : 2014-08-29
Age : 49
- Post n°255
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by SackExchange Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:32
OK, Marty, this is starting to remind me of my college's offense. Using the draw to set up the draw.
The Wicker Man- Honorary Sky Marshall
- Posts : 446
Points : 9486
Join date : 2014-09-09
Age : 59
- Post n°256
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by The Wicker Man Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:33
you can't make it up!
NickSINYC- Honorary Sky Marshall
- Posts : 1235
Points : 13071
Join date : 2014-09-01
- Post n°257
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by NickSINYC Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:33
you have to be kidding me
SackExchange- Moderator
- Posts : 1092
Points : 44832
Join date : 2014-08-29
Age : 49
- Post n°258
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by SackExchange Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:35
Marty...come on.
At least they got the first.
At least they got the first.
NickSINYC- Honorary Sky Marshall
- Posts : 1235
Points : 13071
Join date : 2014-09-01
- Post n°259
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by NickSINYC Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:36
At least we didnt totally lose it after losing that TD 1st down was big
NickSINYC- Honorary Sky Marshall
- Posts : 1235
Points : 13071
Join date : 2014-09-01
- Post n°260
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by NickSINYC Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:38
That's the final nail in the coffin I don't see this ending well now
SackExchange- Moderator
- Posts : 1092
Points : 44832
Join date : 2014-08-29
Age : 49
- Post n°261
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by SackExchange Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:39
And then they squander it. Thanks, Marty. Awful job all around.
Finally moving the ball. The officials wrongly call a TO from a coordinator, and a drive comes to a crashing halt.
Finally moving the ball. The officials wrongly call a TO from a coordinator, and a drive comes to a crashing halt.
soj- Honorary Air Commander
- Posts : 187
Points : 6737
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 74
Location : Scottsdale AZ
Only the HC can call a Time out ... WTF was that?
HYATT™- Supreme Commander
- Posts : 133
Points : 26056
Join date : 2014-09-09
Puh-LEEZE.SackExchange wrote:Maybe some Favre didn't run, but Brett, the QB, did.
Don't be silly.
1,844 CAREER rushing yards.
That's less than 100 yards per SEASON.
602 career rushing attempts, most on the goal line.
That's just under twice a game - and with at least one QB keeper per game, that's not even 1 rushing attempt per game.
Smith is already over 400 career yards rushing.
He keeps it up he'll have 2X as many as Favre in half the time.
SackExchange- Moderator
- Posts : 1092
Points : 44832
Join date : 2014-08-29
Age : 49
- Post n°264
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by SackExchange Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:42
It was garbage.soj wrote:Only the HC can call a Time out ... WTF was that?
Yet you'll continue to hear GB fans whine about how big market teams like NY get all the calls, and how the league hates them.
HYATT™- Supreme Commander
- Posts : 133
Points : 26056
Join date : 2014-09-09
58.5% in ONE game, against one of the best DL in the game, is not even a valid starting point of comparison to 50% against ZERO pass rush and one of the weakest front 7s in the league against the pass.SackExchange wrote:And Rodgers' percentage is now below 60% for the day.
Both would have equal picks, if not for the stripes.
NickSINYC- Honorary Sky Marshall
- Posts : 1235
Points : 13071
Join date : 2014-09-01
- Post n°266
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by NickSINYC Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:45
Figures it would be Nelson again to really end this game
NickSINYC- Honorary Sky Marshall
- Posts : 1235
Points : 13071
Join date : 2014-09-01
- Post n°267
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by NickSINYC Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:46
Tough loss after the start we had to this game. I would be much happier if we were trailing all game
Atljet60- Honorary Sky Marshall
- Posts : 119
Points : 8087
Join date : 2014-09-07
- Post n°268
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by Atljet60 Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:47
Way too many mistakes in this one by the entire team. The Packers are who we thought they were and we let 'em off the hook 
.
.
SackExchange- Moderator
- Posts : 1092
Points : 44832
Join date : 2014-08-29
Age : 49
- Post n°269
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by SackExchange Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:49
The Jets, with this DL, are stout against the run. They are suspect against the pass, and have somewhat limited pass rush abilities.HYATT™ wrote:58.5% against one of the best DL in the game is not even a valid starting point of comparison to 50% against ZERO pass rush and one of the weakest front 7s in the league against the pass.SackExchange wrote:And Rodgers' percentage is now below 60% for the day.
Both would have equal picks, if not for the stripes.
You even spoke earlier about how Geno was facing a real secondary this week, and how it was exposing him. Now you're arguing the Packers have a bad pass defense, and the Jets have a better pass defense than the Packers? Get out of here!
You argue out of both sides of your mouth here.
Not to mention you are citing the front seven to make arguments about pass defense, ignoring the secondary.
SackExchange- Moderator
- Posts : 1092
Points : 44832
Join date : 2014-08-29
Age : 49
- Post n°270
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by SackExchange Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:51
Too many mistakes, way too early to take their foot off the gas, and just an awful loss. 21-3?
If they're not pissed off to the point of decapitating people next week, then they have no heart.
If they're not pissed off to the point of decapitating people next week, then they have no heart.
HYATT™- Supreme Commander
- Posts : 133
Points : 26056
Join date : 2014-09-09
Jets have NOTHING to be ashamed of.
They beat the spread, they held the lede through the half, they had to beat the refs AND a pretty good offense AND one of, if not THE, best secondaries in the NFL, AND they sacked Rodgers FOUR times & beat the crap out of him all afternoon.
They beat the spread, they held the lede through the half, they had to beat the refs AND a pretty good offense AND one of, if not THE, best secondaries in the NFL, AND they sacked Rodgers FOUR times & beat the crap out of him all afternoon.
SackExchange- Moderator
- Posts : 1092
Points : 44832
Join date : 2014-08-29
Age : 49
- Post n°272
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by SackExchange Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:54
Who cares about the spread? All this will do is feed the media's LOLJets obsession.
HYATT™- Supreme Commander
- Posts : 133
Points : 26056
Join date : 2014-09-09
No, I SAID, the Packers have a BAD pass RUSH.SackExchange wrote:The Jets, with this DL, are stout against the run. They are suspect against the pass, and have somewhat limited pass rush abilities.
You even spoke earlier about how Geno was facing a real secondary this week, and how it was exposing him. Now you're arguing the Packers have a bad pass defense, and the Jets have a better pass defense than the Packers? Get out of here!
You argue out of both sides of your mouth here.
Not to mention you are citing the front seven to make arguments about pass defense, ignoring the secondary.
The Packers secondary doesn't have much to do with the pass rush, they help create coverage sacks, if anything, and GB's front 7 had HOW many sacks today? (2 - both on broken plays, NOT coverage sacks.)
SackExchange- Moderator
- Posts : 1092
Points : 44832
Join date : 2014-08-29
Age : 49
- Post n°274
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by SackExchange Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 19:59
Last time the Jets blew an 18-point lead? 2002.
Inexcusable. This was a winnable game. They proved they could outplay that team. And they went into a shell. The defense stopped hitting Rodgers, the offense stopped moving the ball. Just inexcusable.
Still some holes on this team. AWFUL pass coverage, just awful. Geno was decent but inconsistent. The INT, not too much his fault. But they let the Packers load the box at the end.
Inexcusable. This was a winnable game. They proved they could outplay that team. And they went into a shell. The defense stopped hitting Rodgers, the offense stopped moving the ball. Just inexcusable.
Still some holes on this team. AWFUL pass coverage, just awful. Geno was decent but inconsistent. The INT, not too much his fault. But they let the Packers load the box at the end.
Hunter07- Navigator
- Posts : 55
Points : 3621
Join date : 2014-09-03
- Post n°275
Re: New York Jets @ Green Bay Packers (CBS)-4:25PM ET
by Hunter07 Sun 14 Sep 2014 - 20:02
One really tough way to loose - Rex is probably going to give Marty a kick in the n**s ...
Sponsored content
|
|
|