Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

A New Community for Jets Fans


+2
NickSINYC
AFA2017
6 posters

    3 - 4 or 4 - 3 ??

    avatar
    AFA2017
    Navigator
    Navigator


    Posts : 31
    Points : 3469
    Join date : 2014-11-29

    3 - 4  or 4 - 3 ?? Empty 3 - 4 or 4 - 3 ??

    Post by AFA2017 Tue 2 Dec 2014 - 22:00

    Do we stay at a 3 - 4 or switch to a 4 - 3 and maybe a little of both? Granted it will be up to the next coaching staff.
    NickSINYC
    NickSINYC
    Honorary Sky Marshall
    Honorary Sky Marshall


    Posts : 1235
    Points : 13047
    Join date : 2014-09-01

    3 - 4  or 4 - 3 ?? Empty Re: 3 - 4 or 4 - 3 ??

    Post by NickSINYC Tue 2 Dec 2014 - 22:05

    Cy were are you?   lol!
    avatar
    cysporsche
    Supreme Commander
    Supreme Commander


    Posts : 474
    Points : 14012
    Join date : 2014-09-05

    3 - 4  or 4 - 3 ?? Empty Re: 3 - 4 or 4 - 3 ??

    Post by cysporsche Tue 2 Dec 2014 - 22:33

    No brainer for me, I'm a 4-3 guy. Coples looked better @ DE than OLB. In passing situations, I'd go 4-2-5.

    Go Jets...Cyborg
    Sarge
    Sarge
    Supreme Commander
    Supreme Commander


    Posts : 685
    Points : 15748
    Join date : 2014-08-28
    Location : Alabama

    3 - 4  or 4 - 3 ?? Empty Re: 3 - 4 or 4 - 3 ??

    Post by Sarge Tue 2 Dec 2014 - 23:02

    I think Sheldon Richardson would be an awesome 4-3 DE with Harrison and Mo inside
    NickSINYC
    NickSINYC
    Honorary Sky Marshall
    Honorary Sky Marshall


    Posts : 1235
    Points : 13047
    Join date : 2014-09-01

    3 - 4  or 4 - 3 ?? Empty Re: 3 - 4 or 4 - 3 ??

    Post by NickSINYC Tue 2 Dec 2014 - 23:06

    I have always preferred the 4-3 but could live with either as long as it is played well
    avatar
    Old#15
    Honorary Air Commander
    Honorary Air Commander


    Posts : 317
    Points : 8600
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : maryland US

    3 - 4  or 4 - 3 ?? Empty Re: 3 - 4 or 4 - 3 ??

    Post by Old#15 Wed 3 Dec 2014 - 6:43

    Harris would probably not be part of that plan with Davis at the MLB position. We'd be set along the DL, but would need some speed at OLB. I'd welcome the change.
    SackExchange
    SackExchange
    Moderator
    Moderator


    Posts : 1092
    Points : 44808
    Join date : 2014-08-29
    Age : 49

    3 - 4  or 4 - 3 ?? Empty Re: 3 - 4 or 4 - 3 ??

    Post by SackExchange Wed 3 Dec 2014 - 8:56

    I prefer the 4-3, but would have to be convinced the personnel match the system.

    What I don't like is the idea of any sort of base nickel package, or anything that only has six in the box, like a 4-2 or 3-3. When the absolute strength of your team is the front seven, why would you want to make it your front six instead?
    avatar
    cysporsche
    Supreme Commander
    Supreme Commander


    Posts : 474
    Points : 14012
    Join date : 2014-09-05

    3 - 4  or 4 - 3 ?? Empty Re: 3 - 4 or 4 - 3 ??

    Post by cysporsche Wed 3 Dec 2014 - 10:50

    I know this sounds crazy, but I think Sheldon Richardson 6'3"/294 would be a great LB. He was a part time WR, punt & kick returner in H.S.. My point is that he is very fast and quick to react to the ball. He would have to drop some weight. How about this line-up in a 4-3:

    DE - Wilkerson
    DT - Ellis or Barnes
    DT - Snack & Douzable or Finau
    DE - Coples & Hyder

    OLB - Davis
    MLB - Richardson (he would be a monster of a MLB)
    OLB - Reilly, Cunningham or draft pick.

    Note: I'm assuming Harris is a cap hit, Pace, & Babin will be gone ? I won't tackle the DB's until I see Miliner & McDougle healthy.

    Go Jets...Cyborg

    Sponsored content


    3 - 4  or 4 - 3 ?? Empty Re: 3 - 4 or 4 - 3 ??

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Fri 26 Apr 2024 - 11:15